Kesavananda Bharati Case 1973 Explained | Basic Structure Doctrine | NEXT IAS This video explains the landmark Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) judgment that redefined India’s constitutional balance. Triggered by land reform laws affecting religious institutions, the case challenged the scope of Parliament’s amending power under Article 368. In a historic verdict by a 13-judge bench, the Supreme Court held that while Parliament may amend the Constitution, it cannot alter its Basic S

4.8K views · 18 reactions | Political analyst Raghav Awasthi explains the 'Basic Structure Doctrine.' "The courts should exercise its power only in cases where the statute in question is blatantly discriminated," says Raghav Awasthi. #News #NishikantDubey Akshita Nandagopal #ITVideo | India Today | Facebook

2.8K views · 136 reactions | Justice Smokin Wanjala: The Basic Structure Doctrine is not applicable in Kenya... Contrary to what was decided by the Superior courts, there is no provision in our constitution that is unamendable. #BBIFinalVerdict | K24 TV | Facebook