Open Peer-Review Exposes UPV Ethics Committee’s Dilemma: Suppress a 33 Year Recognized Breakthrough or Acknowledge Reviewer’s Ethical Violations and Remit Final Judgement ...

Reviewers also censored ‘comparisons with other people's work’ — a standard requirement of scientific peer review — and declared it ‘unethical’ for an author to disseminate his own submitted abstract ...
The Manila Times

Open Peer-Review Exposes UPV Ethics Committee’s Dilemma: Suppress a 33 Year Recognized Breakthrough or Acknowledge Reviewer’s Ethical Violations and Remit F…

Crosetto Foundation calls for public transparency after TBPET reviewers rejected a Known Dataset Test abstract while failing ...